|
Letter: In situ chemical ionization in ion trap mass
spectrometrythe beneficial influence of isobutane as a reagent gas Stéphane Bouchonnet,a,* Saïd Kinania,
Michel Sabliera and Stéphane Pirnayb aDépartement de Chimie des Mécanismes
Réactionnels, Ecole Polytechnique, route de Saclay, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France. E-mail:
stephane.bouchonnet@dcmr.polytechnique.fr bUniversité Paris Descartes, Faculté de Pharmacie, Neuropsychopharmacologie des addictions,
CNRS, UMR7157 et Université Paris 7, Paris F-75010, France
ABSTRACT:
We report a comparison of the ionization yields provided by the most common reagents (methane,
ammonia, methanol, acetonitrile, isobutane) performing in situ chemical ionization with an ion trap mass spectrometer. Four molecules were chosen in the medical field to
illustrate experimental results: alprazolam, diazepam, flunitrazepam and acetaminophen. Under usual operational conditions, relative abundances of protonated ions appreciably
depend on the reagents. The greatest abundance of MH+ ions was obtained with isobutane while observed intensities for MH+ ions varied from 73%
for methanol and ammonia to about 23% for acetonitrile and methane. Results were temptatively rationalized comparing energies of formation of the reagent ions and storage
efficiency in the trapping field.
Keywords:
ion trap mass spectrometry, chemical ionization reagents, isobutane, benzodiazepines
Back to Table of Contents |